![]() |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Click here to play the commercial in broadband or dialup in Quicktime. See our analysis of the ad. On September 27, after about a week of working by phone to persuade Cadbury Schweppes to remove the ad, the Center sent a letter explaining our concerns about the naughty nurse ad to the following Cadbury Schweppes executives:
The Center also started a campaign, and over the next week, more than 500 nurses and supporters sent letters. 177 of these letters were original. Many of them made powerful points and told moving stories about how this kind of imagery undermines nursing practice. At the same time, the Center continued to place many phone calls to the executives, explaining our concerns to some personally and to most others through very detailed voicemail messages. At the same time, the RNAO launched its own campaign, and over 1,000 nurses reportedly sent letters to the company from their site, many of them apparently long and original. We understand that RNAO also filed a complaint with Advertising Standards Canada, and that the group was also planning a boycott of all Cadbury Schweppes products.
Despite these initial efforts, in early October the company began sending a letter to those who had written about the Dentyne Ice ad explaining why it would not be pulled. This letter, from "Consumer Relations," expressed regret that writers were unhappy with the ad, but offering the following arguments:
However, the ad did not simply present the gum as breath-freshening. It suggested that the breath-freshening was alone sufficient to get nurses who had never before met these patients to become physically romantic. It did not suggest that it was just a case of the girlfriends of these men becoming more interested in them because of the gum. Nor did it suggest that members of both genders were subject to this effect, or even that it was just random women anywhere. It focused on female members of a predominantly female profession, who have been subject to a specific and enduring professional stereotype of easy sexual availability and frivolousness. The market testing is irrelevant. Average members of the public may have trouble picking up on how ads like this degrade nursing, after a lifetime of ingesting this same stereotype and related assumptions. Many stereotypes only have a strong conscious impact on the immediate victims, in this case nurses, and it's not surprising that others who have never thought about it would be unaware. Nursing stereotypes in particular have not been carefully considered, and so it is even less likely that the average person will be sensitive to them. Of course, this lack of conscious awareness does not mean the ad will not subtly reinforce the stereotype that nurses are sexually available twits. The Center redoubled its efforts to explain why the company's initial defenses of the ads were faulty, with a further series of calls to the executives. Meanwhile, nurses and supporters continued to send powerful letters. Cadbury Schweppes gets fresher, agrees to withdraw the ad On October 5, Cadbury Schweppes Canada sent the following letter to the Center and a substantially identical one to RNAO. The letter, from Canadian corporate communication director Luisa Girotto, read in part:
Also on October 5, Cadbury Schweppes CEO Todd Stitzer called Center director Sandy Summers from London and left a voicemail. Mr. Stitzer wanted to be sure we knew that the ads would be pulled, and to convey that he understood our concerns about the nursing image. We anticipate speaking with Mr. Stitzer this week, and we will thank him and encourage further constructive steps. We want to thank you! Nurses and supporters got the attention of the leaders of this huge corporation because they spoke up and would not be deterred. We thank all those who wrote, especially those who took the time to send original thoughts. We read each original letter and in many cases sat here thinking--"how could the company not find these persuasive?" Apparently it did. Nurses told how the naughty nurse stereotype affected them, and how it affected the care they could deliver, using specific examples and persuasive arguments. Many thanks go to Marguerite Thomas (Ontario), Karla Monroe (Indiana), Mandy Mayling (Los Angeles) and the Nazareth College of Rochester for invigorating their local communities to take action. We also want to thank RNAO and its Executive Director Doris Grinspun and Director of Communications Marion Zych for the great work in generating so many letters, and for their other creative steps, including filing a complaint with the advertising board and the planned boycott. Thank Cadbury Schweppes, and encourage the company to excel We thank Cadbury Schweppes for paying attention to our concerns (albeit belatedly) and acting to limit the damage from this ad. We have reason to hope that the company will make an effort to avoid stereotypical nurse imagery in the future. We are especially encouraged by Cadbury Schweppes's promise to test future Canadian and U.S. ads involving "nurses" with actual nurses. Please send Cadbury Schweppes executives a follow-up message to thank them for pulling the ad. Please encourage them to follow through on the promise to consult nurses about future advertising. You may also wish to ask the company to run a positive commercial featuring nurses (send them your ideas!). And you may want to encourage the company to make amends to nursing in tangible ways, perhaps through support for nursing schools or improvements in clinical settings. Please click here to send a thank you message! Thank you and congratulations for your great work.
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The URL for this page is www.nursingadvocacy.org/news/2007/oct/06_dentyne.html |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||