![]() |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
To inspire and be inspired
In both ads, an apparent nurse speaks conversationally about what brought him to U of M, with the same male narrator delivering tag lines at the end. The first ad:
(hear the ad
Please believe us--we love the idea of doing good things for disabled kids. And we don't doubt that the nurse here is describing a wonderful program (the University has informed us that this is a real nurse describing a real program). You might even argue that the summer camp ideas are a kind of nursing, in the sense that nurses examine patients' needs and come up with creative ideas to improve their overall wellbeing, though we doubt many non-nurses would get that from the ad. The problem is that many non-nurses could have come up with these good ideas. There does not seem to have been a need for nursing training or skill here. This nurse does not sound like a traditional camp nurse. Is he a specialist in Summer Camp Design Nursing? Or is it Treehouse Nursing? The message to the average listener is that nurses are wonderful, giving people who love to help kids. They inspire and are inspired, they love what they do, they're lucky and blessed. But do they have any health care skill? Do they save lives and improve outcomes? Is this going to appeal to academically ambitious candidates who might not be thinking of nursing? Is there anything here that the public was not well aware of when possibly the worst nursing shortage in U.S. history began nearly a decade ago? The second ad: (hear the ad
Once again, please believe that we love the idea of helping kids fight cancer. We are definitely in favor of it. And this ad is a little better in that it at least touches on what nurses do in clinical settings. We also get the sense from the nurse's history of skilled jobs that he is an accomplished person, so nursing must have some appeal for such persons. Unfortunately, the ad remains maddeningly vague on what nurses actually do. All we hear is that they "help" sick kids fight cancer. And of course, they inspire and are inspired, and they don't really have "jobs"--what they're doing is a vocation, a calling, a noble virtuous spiritual endeavor that, well, when you think about it, they're just angels, gosh, angels we say! So, naturally, they don't need more nursing teachers, or staff, or protection from workplace threats, or a break to eat, because heaven meets those needs for angels, if they have such needs. Of course, it's hard not to compare these ads to the pre-2007 TV recruitment ads in Johnson & Johnson's Campaign for Nursing Future. Like the Michigan ads, the J&J ads presented variations on the angel stereotype, and the overall impression was not of a skilled profession that made the difference between life and death. But at least the J&J ads showed nurses doing something in clinical settings. One irony in the Michigan ads is that, despite the fact that only men appear in them, they still focus on highly gendered imagery, on qualities that have traditionally been associated with women. The exception is the treehouse construction, but that's not enough to counter the overall themes. Like the J&J ads, the Michigan ads may be a good way for a huge, powerful institution to assure the public that it is really soft and benevolent. But they also reinforce damaging stereotypes about nursing. We thank the University of Michigan for trying. But we hope it will consider whether nurses really need the public to hear that they excel at being noble. Please send your feedback to: Dave Burdon, Director of Marketing at dbrudon@med.umich.edu. And please copy us on the letter at letters@nursingadvocacy.org. Thank you! Snail mail letters can be sent to: Dave Burdon, Director of Marketing
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The URL for this page is www.nursingadvocacy.org/news/2007/aug/umich_radio.html |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||