![]() |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Fast, Cheap & Out of Control
See the film clip (if you have a PC) or read the transcript. The piece runs about 3 1/2 minutes and has the onscreen subtitle: "Walk-in Health Care: Are Quick Clinics Worth It?" Host Katie Couric introduces the segment. She notes that the "quickie" clinics are responding to patients' weariness with long waits to see their "doctor[s]," but asks, "are you putting your health at risk?" Lieberman begins her piece from a CVS store "where you can fill your basket with diapers, mouthwash and shampoo, and get a quickie diagnosis on the cheap." The piece runs a clip from "Curb Your Enthusiasm" in which Larry David starts to lose it after having to wait at a physician's office and dealing with the immovable office bureaucrats, who may or may not be nurses. Lieberman comes back and talks to shoppers who avoid this "hassle and expense" by getting care at the supermarket. Lieberman notes that companies like MinuteClinic are increasingly putting "medical kiosks" in such stores at which patients simply sign in, start shopping, then soon get paged for care at clinics whose "goal is to examine, prescribe and medicate patients, sending them on their way before their frozen food melts." However, Lieberman explains, "critics are concerned that MinuteClinics are staffed by nurse practitioners who are licensed to treat patients and prescribe medications, but have far less training than doctors." Suddenly, though we have been watching visuals of the store environments with significant background noise, the piece moves to an authoritative talking head interview clip with "Dr. Edward Hill," the president of the American Medical Association. (Silence! An authoritative health care expert!) Hill explains that "[o]ur only concern is that we don't confuse convenience and affordability--even affordability with quality. And...there's a concern about supervision of these non-physician providers." Then "Dr. James Woodburn," apparently the MinuteClinic's medical director, appears to assure viewers that the clinics are "not a replacement for the primary care relationship." A moment later, a patient compares NP quick clinic care to that of a "regular doctor": "I go to a regular doctor when it's a mystery, I don't know what's going on." Lieberman ends the piece by getting her flu shot on camera, noting in passing--no big deal--that MinuteClinic has given 60,000 flu shots. She turns to the clinic NP and says: "Ready, Kathy?" Kathy responds: "Ready." Although the piece has shown NPs giving care throughout, and at times we can tell that they are speaking to patients, Kathy's word is the only one an NP delivers to the television audience in the entire piece. So what's wrong with that? Most obviously, though the segment talks to several patients and physicians, it fails to get any comment from the NPs whose care is the subject of the piece--a mark of disrespect that would be amazing, if we weren't talking about nurses. So there is essentially no rebuttal to the scary suggestions that patients may be "putting [their] health at risk," that NPs have "far less training" than physicians, that NPs provide poor quality care and need physician supervision, and that NPs are unable to diagnose, and so can only help when patients already know what's wrong with them. In fact, as the piece fails to note, NPs typically have six years of college-level training, a four-year bachelors degree in nursing and a two-year master's degree in nursing. And even if NPs did have somewhat less formal training than physicians, that would not mean their care was inadequate. On the contrary, extensive research has demonstrated that NP care is at least as good as that of physicians. The piece provides no evidence, even anecdotal, of any specific problems with the quality of NP care, at quick clinics or elsewhere. None. In addition, "Today"'s U.S. viewers might never know that the nation's 110,000 NPs actually play a vital role in comprehensive primary care, especially in underserved communities, nor that their diagnostic skills are excellent. As skilled professionals, quick clinic NPs are well qualified to refer patients to other primary care providers when that is indicated. NPs do not need physician "supervision," though some legislation may nominally require that. Because physicians compete with NPs, comments like those of Dr. Hill generally reflect economic self-interest, bias, and/or genuine (if uninformed) concern about patient safety. The "Today" producers should have realized that NPs deserved a chance to defend their work. The inclusion of only physician comment suggests that only physicians are qualified to comment on nursing care--an absurd misconception. Even the piece's language degrades NP care. Patients reportedly get a "quickie diagnosis on the cheap" in between diapers and toothpaste, the clinic NPs work in "kiosks" (do they sell magazines too?), and they seem to have only first names, as opposed to the esteemed physicians who are addressed as "Dr. ____." We realize that working in a quick clinic means you will have to face comparisons of your care to the surrounding consumer products. But the piece fails to provide balance as to NPs' skill or the importance of their care. At worst, the segment's "cheap quickie" language has overtones of illicit sex. At best, it suggests that NP care is fast, cheap and out of control. The piece also largely ignores the huge public health benefits of the preventative care at which NPs excel. The quick clinic NPs provide affordable, convenient health screenings and vaccinations. We hear about the 60,000 flu shots, but there is no suggestion that many if not most of the recipients may otherwise not have gotten a flu shot at all, nor any hint that influenza continues to kill tens of thousands in the U.S. alone each year. Vaccinations and screenings have saved millions of lives. And if more people had access to them--such as the 1 in 6 Americans who now lack health insurance--they could save millions more. The quick clinics are not meant to provide all primary care, but they may help many patients get vital care they would not otherwise get at all. Such NP-run clinics may be a promising new basic care model in an often hostile and inaccessible health care system. UPDATE -- December 4, 2005
December 14, 2005 -- UPDATE -- see our update on this campaign below.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| You can also translate this Center for Nursing Advocacy page from English into your own language by clicking on the appropriate flag on the right. |
Our Sponsors |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
Individual Sponsors
==========
Lucille McCarthy ==========
==========
Bernice Buresh Suzanne Gordon Sara Kozup Diana J. Mason Karen J. Stanley ==========
Andrea Brassard Barbara Chamberlain Cathy Dain M. Elayne DeSimone Mary Dominiak Drexel University Jones and Bartlett Publishers Angela McBride Donna Nickitas Professional Services Network Linda Pugh Elizabeth Richardson Cynthia Stock Harry Summers Sandy Summers Barbara Wright ========== Please see our full list of donors on our supporting members page |
The URL for this page is www.nursingadvocacy.org/news/2005nov/14_today.html
© 2003-2008 The Center for Nursing Advocacy, Inc. All Rights Reserved.