![]() |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
"You should reprimand him...make him change bedpans."
Nurses do occasionally appear in the episode to move an object or take orders. Our favorite was when one of the interns told a nurse staffing a desk to find the family of the brain dead donor, and the wide-eyed nurse asked if they wanted to do to that in order to arrange organ donation. This presents the nurse as a passive clerk unconnected to patient care. Indeed, it's not clear that this nurse is directly responsible for any specific patients; apparently she just waits around for a fledgling physician to tell her what to do. In reality, nurses actively take the lead in coordinating the efforts of the health care team on behalf of their patients, which would include locating and supporting the family of a patient like this, and working with the transplant coordinators. No ICU or ED nurse would need a new intern to tell her that a young brain dead patient was a potential organ donor, or to initiate the process. The episode's poor presentation of organ donation may be troubling to nurses and organ donation advocates as well. The show's basic idea seems to be that it is hard but necessary for people to let go of an irreversibly brain-dead person when another life can be saved, and that health care workers should be sensitive in facilitating this. But viewers will not get that dedicated professionals have developed practices to assure that this process is conducted with competence, care and sensitivity. When the inept intern brusquely asks permission to transplant the donor's skin, the family seems terrified that the physicians want all of it, which would preclude an open casket viewing. Viewers are not told that such a skin donation would affect only discrete areas that would not be noticeable in a viewing. Likewise, after the main organ donation, two interns come back to sew up the donor's open chest cavity as a kind afterthought, as if that was not standard procedure. Thus, despite the episode's effort to show the value of organ donation, we fear that its inaccurate vision of donation mechanics will actually have a net negative effect on such donations. The organ recipient, an old friend of the chief of surgery, is a genial man who spends much of the episode playfully flirting with an awkward male intern, even as the intern's colleagues all seem to be under the mistaken impression that he is gay. When the chief of surgery asks how the hospital is treating his friend, the patient teasingly says fine, "except that beautiful boy [the intern] won't let me smoke. You should reprimand him...make him change bedpans." And who is usually associated with changing bedpans? Yes, this is a joke, and bedpans are not pleasant, but the obvious message is that changing bedpans is a punishment for junior wrongdoers, not something that serious professionals do as part of their health care assessments. Perhaps the show's creators don't know that changing bedpans is a vital opportunity for nurses to assess life-threatening hemorrhage, bowel obstruction, infection, dehydration, diabetes, intestinal trauma or herniation, bowel or uterine prolapse, parasitic infections, kidney, gallbladder or liver disease, dementia, mobility and independence problems--just to name a few. (A recent "House" episode revolved around the physician characters' difficulty in identifying a condition that a nurse's basic examination of the critical patient's bedpan could have revealed--if the show had any nurse characters or understanding of nursing.) Interns are not qualified to make these assessments. It's not surprising that the show would present this important nursing role as a mock punishment, but it still reinforces the stereotypical undervaluation of the profession's work. There is a reason the patient did not joke that the intern should be made to take part in bowel surgery, and the reason is that, unlike bedpans, that is not seen as a mindless task for uneducated servants. Like the show's other anti-nurse comments, this is not in and of itself a problem of accuracy; such a patient might really have said this. The problem is that the statement reflects a common stereotype that the public does not realize is inaccurate, and that the show gives viewers no reason to question the stereotype. Perhaps the episode's oblique link between homosexuality and nursing is an appropriate one. Just as many have feared to express "the love that dare not speak its name," the episode's relentless depiction of its pretty young physician characters doing key nursing tasks suggests a secret affection for nursing--even as the show's creators continue to present ostensible contempt for the profession. Is it possible that the producers are simply afraid to confess their true feelings for the widely disrespected nursing profession by having nurses do the nursing that the episode presents as central to patient outcomes? If so, we can only encourage them to come out of the closet and, in the words of one of their intern characters, get "down with the rainbow." See our most recent analysis on our "Grey's Anatomy" action page and send our most recent instant letter to the show. It just takes a minute.We all sent 500+ letters out so far (145 original). Let's see if we can double that this week. Thank you! After you have sent letter #3, please go to the ABC "Grey's Anatomy" message board and post your comments or your letter to change the way the fans think about the show, to help pressure "Grey's Anatomy" to either improve or get off the air. |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The URL for this page is www.nursingadvocacy.org/news/2005apr/10_greys.html |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||