![]() |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Who are nurse practitioners? September 7, 2004 -- Tonight the popular television quiz show "Jeopardy!" implied that Nurse Practitioners treat only "minor ailments," rather than the critical illnesses and complex procedures that many handle every day. In fact, a growing body of research shows that NP care is at least good as that of physicians. The common media stereotype of Advanced Practice Registered Nurses (APRN's) as minimally trained sub-professionals must end if we are to improve nursing's image and strengthen the profession. We need your help. In our view, perpetuating the stereotype of NP's as sub-professionals is not unlike presenting the view that AIDS is not caused by the HIV virus without mentioning the wealth of clinical research finding the opposite. See our update on the Jeopardy campaign! Prior action is below: Nurses need to educate not only our legislative bodies about the quality of APRN work, but also the media, which affects how the public--and public officials--view health issues. We urge you to begin with the writers of "Jeopardy!" specifically by writing to them.
Sandy Summers, RN, MSN, MPH September 18, 2004 Jeopardy! A: These graduate-prepared health professionals provide patient care that studies have found to be at least as good as that of physicians. Q: Who are nurse practitioners? I am writing to express my concern about an inaccurate and harmful statement about nurse practitioners made during the episode of "Jeopardy!" broadcast on September 7, 2004. In this episode, there was an "answer" which read "Minor ailments can be treated by NPs (Nurse-practitioners) & PAs (these)." The contestant answered "correctly" by stating: "What are Physician's Assistants?". One of the most damaging anti-nurse stereotypes is that APRNs aren't real health care providers. The media often implies that patients see NPs for a sore throat or an ear ache and nothing more. This sends the message that NPs are minimally trained sub-professionals who deal with matters so simple that physicians can't be bothered, a message reinforced by the physician organizations that lobby hard to prevent APRN independent practice and reimbursement. (The ostensible reason for the intense physician campaigns is concern for patient well-being, but NP organizations see a clear anti-competitive motive.) We very rarely see articles mention the increasing number of clinical studies finding that APRN care is equal to or better than that provided by physicians. www.nursingadvocacy.org/faq/apn_md_relative_merits.html. Many who create negative media about nurses doubt that such media can really harm the nursing profession. However, as public health professionals at USC's Hollywood, Health and Society project and elsewhere can tell you, the media does affect how people think and act with regard to health issues. Inaccurate and unfounded comments such as the one aired by "Jeopardy!" contribute to an unattractive media image, which in turn affects how people think and act with regard to nursing. We are in the midst of an unprecedented global nursing shortage that is only expected to worsen over the next two decades. The nursing shortage is one of our most urgent public health crises, and attaining accurate media coverage of nursing is an important factor in resolving the shortage. Indeed, a key reason that nursing is in its current state--understaffed, underfunded and underempowered--is that the work of nurses is undervalued by the general public and health care decision makers, all of whom are affected by the media. Such disrespect also directly discourages nurses and potential nurses. Sandy Summers, RN, MSN, MPH
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The URL for this page is http://www.nursingadvocacy.org/news/2004sep/jeopardy.html |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||